A Randomised Phase II Trial to Evaluate the Feasibility of Radiotherapy Dose Escalation, Facilitated by Intensity-Modulated Arc Radiotherapy Techniques, in High-Risk Neuroblastoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: For high-risk neuroblastoma, planning target volume coverage is often compromised to respect adjacent kidney tolerance. This trial investigated whether intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy techniques (IMAT) could facilitate dose escalation better than conventional techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Children with high-risk abdominal neuroblastoma referred for radiotherapy to the primary tumour site and involved regional lymph nodes were randomised to receive either standard dose (21 Gy in 14 fractions) or escalated dose (36 Gy in 24 fractions) radiotherapy. Dual planning with both a conventional anterior-posterior parallel opposed pair radiotherapy technique and an IMAT technique was performed. The quality of target volume and organ-at-risk delineation, and dosimetric plans, were externally reviewed. Dosimetric parameters were used to judge the superior technique for treatment. This feasibility trial was not powered to detect improvement in outcome with dose escalation. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2020, 50 patients were randomised and dual-planned. The IMAT technique was judged more favourable in 48 patients. In all patients randomised to receive 36 Gy, IMAT would have permitted delivery of the full dose (median D50% 36.0 Gy, inter-quartile range 36.0-36.1 Gy) to the target volume, whereas dose compromise would have been required with conventional planning (median D50% 35.6 Gy, inter-quartile range 28.7-35.9 Gy). CONCLUSION: IMAT facilitates safe dose escalation to 36 Gy in patients receiving radiotherapy for neuroblastoma. The value of dose escalation is now being evaluated in a current prospective phase III randomised trial.

Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy Case Selection for Paediatric Abdominal Neuroblastoma: Effects of Tumour Location and Bowel Gas.

AIMS: Pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy is an increasingly used radiation modality for childhood malignancies due to its ability to minimise dose to surrounding organs. However, the dosimetry is extremely sensitive to anatomical and density changes. The aims of this study were to investigate if there is a dosimetric benefit or detriment with PBS for paediatric abdominal neuroblastoma, assess gastrointestinal air variability and its dosimetric consequences, plus identify if there are factors that could assist case selection for PBS referral. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty neuroblastoma cases were double-planned with PBS and intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT). Cases were divided into unilateral, midline unilateral and midline bilateral locations in relation to the kidneys. Plans were recalculated after the gastrointestinal volume was simulated as air (Hounsfield Units -700) and water (Hounsfield Units 0), then compared with nominal plans (recalculated - nominal, ΔD). Forty-three weekly cone beam computed tomography scans were analysed to quantify gastrointestinal air variability during treatment. RESULTS: PBS reduced the mean dose to normal tissues at all tumour locations, particularly unilateral tumours. However, 15% had better dosimetry with IMAT, all of which were midline tumours. Increased gastrointestinal air caused significant compromises to PBS versus IMAT plans for midline tumours [median/maximum ΔD95% clinical target volume (CTV) -2.4%/-15.7% PBS versus 1.4%/0% IMAT, P = 0.003], whereas minimal impact was observed for unilateral tumours (ΔD95% CTV -0.5%/-1.9% PBS versus 0.5%/-0.5% IMAT, P = 0.008). D95% CTV was significantly decreased in PBS plans if planning target volume (PTV) ≥400 cm3 (median -4.1%, P = 0.001) or PTV extension ≥60% anterior to vertebral body (-2.1%, P = 0.002). A larger variation in gastrointestinal air was observed in patients treated under general anaesthesia (median 38.4%) versus awake (11.5%); P = 0.004. CONCLUSION: In this planning study, tumours at the unilateral location consistently showed improved dose reductions to normal tissue with minimal dose degradation from increased gastrointestinal air with PBS plans. Tumour location, PTV volume and anterior extension of PTV are useful characteristics in facilitating patient selection for PBS.

Paediatric Molecular Radiotherapy: Challenges and Opportunities.

The common contemporary indications for paediatric molecular radiotherapy (pMRT) are differentiated thyroid cancer and neuroblastoma. It may also have value in neuroendocrine cancers, and it is being investigated in clinical trials for other diseases. pMRT is the prototypical biomarker-driven, precision therapy, with a unique mode of delivery and mechanism of action. It is safe and well tolerated, compared with other treatments. However, its full potential has not yet been achieved, and its wider use faces a number of challenges and obstacles. Paradoxically, the success of radioactive iodine as a curative treatment for metastatic thyroid cancer has led to a 'one size fits all' approach and limited academic enquiry into optimisation of the conventional treatment regimen, until very recently. Second, the specialised requirements for the delivery of pMRT are available in only a very limited number of centres. This limited capacity and geographical coverage results in reduced accessibility. With few enthusiastic advocates for this treatment modality, investment in research to improve treatments and broaden indications from both industry and national and charitable research funders has historically been suboptimal. Nonetheless, there is now an increasing interest in the opportunities offered by pMRT. Increased research funding has been allocated, and technical developments that will permit innovative approaches in pMRT are available for exploration. A new portfolio of clinical trials is being assembled. These studies should help to move at least some paediatric treatments from simply palliative use into potentially curative protocols. Therapeutic strategies require modification and optimisation to achieve this. The delivery should be personalised and tailored appropriately, with a comprehensive evaluation of tumour and organ-at-risk dosimetry, in alignment with the external beam model of radiotherapy. This article gives an overview of the current status of pMRT, indicating the barriers to progress and identifying ways in which these may be overcome.

The Evidence for External Beam Radiotherapy in High-Risk Neuroblastoma of Childhood: A Systematic Review.

AIMS: External beam radiotherapy is widely used in various ways in the management of neuroblastoma. Despite extensive clinical experience, the precise role of radiotherapy in neuroblastoma remains unclear. The purpose of this systematic review was to survey the published literature to identify, without bias, the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of external beam radiotherapy as part of the initial multimodality treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma. We considered four areas: treatment of the tumour bed and residual primary tumour, identification of any dose-response relationship, treatment of metastatic sites, identification of any technical advances that may be beneficial. We also aimed to define uncertainties, which may be clarified in future clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bibliographic databases were searched for neuroblastoma and radiotherapy. Reviewers assessed 1283 papers for inclusion by title and abstract, with consensus achieved through discussion. Data extraction on 57 included papers was carried out by one reviewer and checked by another. Studies were assessed for their level of evidence and risk of bias, and a descriptive analysis of data was carried out. RESULTS: Fifteen papers provided some evidence that radiotherapy to the tumour bed and residual tumour may possibly be of value. However, there is a significant risk of bias and no evidence that all subgroups will benefit. There is some suggestion from six papers that dose may be important, but no hard evidence. It remains unclear whether irradiation of metastatic sites is helpful. Technical advances may be of value in radiotherapy of high-risk neuroblastoma. CONCLUSIONS: There are data that show that radiotherapy is of some efficacy in the management of high-risk neuroblastoma, but there is no level one evidence that shows that it is being used in the best possible way. Prospective randomised trials are necessary to provide more evidence to guide development of optimal radiotherapy treatment schedules.

Hearing loss in survivors of childhood head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma: a long-term follow-up study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the hearing status of survivors treated for head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma (HNRMS) at long-term follow-up. DESIGN: Cross-sectional long-term follow-up study. SETTING: Tertiary comprehensive cancer centre. PARTICIPANTS: Survivors treated for HNRMS during childhood in two concurrent cohorts; survivors in London had been treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT-based local therapy); survivors in Amsterdam were treated with AMORE (Ablative surgery, MOuld technique afterloading brachytherapy and surgical REconstruction) if feasible, otherwise EBRT (AMORE-based local therapy). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed hearing status of HNRMS survivors at long-term follow-up. Hearing thresholds were obtained by pure-tone audiometry. METHODS: We assessed the hearing thresholds, the number of patients with clinically relevant hearing loss and hearing impairment graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAEv4) and Boston criteria. Furthermore, we compared hearing loss between survivors treated with EBRT-based local therapy (London) and AMORE-based local therapy (Amsterdam). RESULTS: Seventy-three survivors were included (median follow-up 11 years). We found clinically relevant hearing loss at speech frequencies in 19% of survivors. Multivariable analysis showed that survivors treated with EBRT-based treatment and those with parameningeal tumours had significantly more hearing impairment, compared to survivors treated with AMORE-based treatment and non-parameningeal tumours. CONCLUSIONS: One in five survivors of HNRMS developed clinically relevant hearing loss. AMORE-based treatment resulted in less hearing loss compared to EBRT-based treatment. As hearing loss was highly prevalent and also occurred in survivors with orbital primaries, we recommend systematic audiological follow-up in all HNRMS survivors.

Radiation exposure to comforters and carers during paediatric molecular radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: To show whether the incidental radiation exposure received by comforters and carers of children undergoing molecular radiotherapy was kept as low as reasonably achievable and was within English national dose constraints. PROCEDURE: The radiation exposure of adult comforters and carers was routinely monitored with a whole body personal dose meter while the child was in hospital. Data were collected on iodine-131 meta-iodobenzylguanidine (131 I-mIBG), lutetium-177 DOTATATE (177 Lu-DOTATATE), and iodine-131 sodium iodide (131 I-NaI) treatments. RESULTS: Data were available for 50 treatments with high-administered activity double-infusion 131 I-mIBG and 12 single administrations; 15 177 Lu-DOTATATE treatments and 28 131 I-NaI administrations. The median age was 7 years (1-18). The median administered activity of: 131 I-mIBG was 16.2 GBq (6.8-59 GBq) for double infusion patients and 8.1 GBq (5.26-16.25 GBq) for single administrations; 177 Lu-DOTATATE was 7.2 GBq (2.5-7.5 GBq); and 131 I-NaI was 3 GBq for thyroid remnant ablation and 5.5 GBq for cancer therapy. The median number of comforters and carers for all administrations was 2 (range 1-9). The median exposure values for comforters and carers for high-administered activity 131 I-mIBG administrations was 302 µSv (0-5282 µSv); for single fraction 131 I-mIBG 163 µSv (3-3104 µSv); 177 Lu-DOTATATE 6 µSv (1-79 µSv); and 131 I-NaI 37 µSv (0-274 µSv). Only one of the comforters and carers exceeded the dose constraint of 5 mSv. CONCLUSIONS: Doses to comforters and carers were in all but one case within the dose constraint nationally recommended by the Health Protection Agency, now part of Public Health England. New evidence is presented which show that comforter and carer radiation exposure levels from paediatric molecular radiotherapy in routine clinical practice are acceptably low. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62:235-239. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Optimization of molecular radiotherapy with [131I]-meta Iodobenzylguanidine for high-risk neuroblastoma.

Molecular radiotherapy with [131I]-meta Iodobenzylguanidine ([131I]-mIBG) for neuroblastoma has been in clinical use for nearly 30 years. In this time, its role has changed from being an exclusively palliative treatment to one where the intent of treatment is often curative. To achieve this, the treatment has been brought forward from the relapse setting, to the beginning as induction therapy, as a possibility for salvage of those with chemo-refractory disease or as part of consolidation schedules. With the routine use of hemopoietic support, higher than previously standard administered activities are now commonly used. Other attempts to improve outcomes include the concomitant use of chemotherapy and radiation sensitisers and novel formulations such as no-carrier added [131I]-mIBG. Unfortunately, none of these strategies has been evaluated in a randomized controlled trial, so whether the theoretical benefits of these innovative approaches are seen clinically remains a matter of conjecture. Despite the prevalent belief in using higher administered activities, dosimetry has been under-used, hampering the ability to detect the benefit of this strategy. To properly evaluate concepts aiming at the optimisation of molecular radiotherapy with [131I]-mIBG for high-risk neuroblastoma, careful dosimetry in well-designed randomized clinical trials is essential. Only in this way will it be possible for [131I]-mIBG to be used to its best advantage in the complex multimodality treatment schedules required for high-risk neuroblastoma.